Trought & Ors v R.
The judge was entitled to admit hearsay evidence and notes, exclude interview evidence, find sufficient evidence for conviction, apply cross-admissibility, and impose sentences above guideline starting points due to aggravating factors; no error or manifest excess found.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Frazer Trought; Appellant: Nader Assaf; Appellant: David Lawal; Appellant: Vladimir Kana; Appellant: Fadi Jameel; Appellant: Edward Lightfoot; Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 31 October 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Conviction and Sentence Appeals
- Outcome
- All appeals against conviction and sentence dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Conspiracy, Drug Trafficking, Hearsay Evidence, Sentencing, Cross Admissibility, Totality Principle
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Frazer Trought
Appellant
Nader Assaf
Appellant
David Lawal
Appellant
Vladimir Kana
Appellant
Fadi Jameel
Appellant
Edward Lightfoot
Appellant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Conviction and Sentence Appeals
Legal Issues
- 1 Admissibility of hearsay evidence from absent co-accused
- 2 Admission of handwritten notes as evidence
- 3 Refusal to admit police interview of co-accused
Ratio Decidendi
The judge was entitled to admit hearsay evidence and notes, exclude interview evidence, find sufficient evidence for conviction, apply cross-admissibility, and impose sentences above guideline starting points due to aggravating factors; no error or manifest excess found.
Court Disposition
All appeals against conviction and sentence dismissed.
Orders
- Appeal against conviction dismissed.
- Renewed and new applications for leave to appeal dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment