Edwards, R. v
The minimum term for the IPP sentence was manifestly excessive as the sentencing judge failed to properly consider the totality of offending and the effect of early guilty pleas; the minimum term is reduced to four years less time on remand, and concurrent extended sentences are imposed for specified but not serious offences.
- Parties
- Appellant: Frederick Edwards; Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 October 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Imprisonment for Public Protection, Extended Sentences, Dangerousness, Totality Principle
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Frederick Edwards
Appellant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the minimum term imposed under the sentence of imprisonment for public protection was manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether the sentencing judge erred in not imposing sentences on all counts
- 3 Proper application of extended sentences for specified but not serious offences
Ratio Decidendi
The minimum term for the IPP sentence was manifestly excessive as the sentencing judge failed to properly consider the totality of offending and the effect of early guilty pleas; the minimum term is reduced to four years less time on remand, and concurrent extended sentences are imposed for specified but not serious offences.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Minimum term for IPP sentence reduced to four years less 182 days on remand
- Concurrent extended sentences totalling three years (18 months custodial, 18 months extension) imposed for specified but not serious offences
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment