Hawkes v Cuddy & Ors
Costs on the cross-petition are to be set off against costs on the petition, with specific percentages allocated to reflect relative success and to avoid unnecessary assessment. Mr Hawkes is to pay 80% of the Cuddys' costs of the appeal, and an interim payment is ordered for appeal costs only.
- Parties
- Appellant: Frederick Geraint Hawkes; Respondent: Simone Francesca Cuddy; Respondent: Michael Cuddy; Respondent: Neath Rugby Limited; Respondent: Neath-Swansea Ospreys Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 April 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Costs Determination After Appeal
- Outcome
- costs apportioned and set off as specified; interim payment ordered for appeal costs only
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Counterclaims, Set Off, Appeals
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Frederick Geraint Hawkes
Appellant
Simone Francesca Cuddy
Respondent
Michael Cuddy
Respondent
Neath Rugby Limited
Respondent
Neath-Swansea Ospreys Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Costs Determination After Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 How should costs be apportioned between the petition and cross-petition?
- 2 What is the appropriate set-off for costs incurred on the cross-petition?
- 3 Should interim payments on account of costs be ordered?
Ratio Decidendi
Costs on the cross-petition are to be set off against costs on the petition, with specific percentages allocated to reflect relative success and to avoid unnecessary assessment. Mr Hawkes is to pay 80% of the Cuddys' costs of the appeal, and an interim payment is ordered for appeal costs only.
Court Disposition
costs apportioned and set off as specified; interim payment ordered for appeal costs only
Orders
- No order as to costs on the petition until 23 July 2007.
- From 23 July 2007 to 23 October 2007, Mr Hawkes to pay the Cuddys 90% of their costs on the petition.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment