Taylor, R v [2018] EWCA Crim 2187 (24 July 2018)

Taylor, R v [2018] EWCA Crim 2187 (24 July 2018)

The original sentences of twelve months' imprisonment were unduly lenient given the seriousness, repeated nature, and aggravating features of the offences. The appropriate sentence, after measured adjustment for historical maxima and mitigation, was thirty months' imprisonment concurrent on each count.

Citation
[2018] EWCA Crim 2187
Parties
Prosecution: Regina; Defendant: Frederick Taylor
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
24 July 2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal Reference by Attorney General / Sentence Review Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
Outcome
Sentence increased on reference; original sentence quashed.
Legal Topics
Indecent Assault, Sentencing, Abuse of Trust, Unduly Lenient Sentences

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecution

Frederick Taylor

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal Reference by Attorney General / Sentence Review Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988

  1. 1 Whether the original sentence imposed for indecent assault was unduly lenient
  2. 2 Proper categorisation of harm and culpability under modern sentencing guidelines
  3. 3 Appropriate adjustment for historical offences with lower statutory maxima

Ratio Decidendi

The original sentences of twelve months' imprisonment were unduly lenient given the seriousness, repeated nature, and aggravating features of the offences. The appropriate sentence, after measured adjustment for historical maxima and mitigation, was thirty months' imprisonment concurrent on each count.

Court Disposition

Sentence increased on reference; original sentence quashed.

Orders

  • Leave to refer granted.
  • Sentence of twelve months' imprisonment on each count quashed.