Department for Business Enterprise & Regulatory Reform v O'Brien & Anor
The Tribunal failed to give appropriate weight to the in-built public interest in withholding information to which legal professional privilege applies under section 42 FOIA. The Tribunal's decision ordering disclosure of documents subject to section 42 exemption is quashed and remitted to a differently constituted Tribunal for reconsideration. The Tribunal's decision regarding documents opposed on section 35 grounds is upheld.
- Parties
- Appellant/claimant: Department for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform; First Respondent/defendant: Dermod O’Brien; Second Respondent/defendant: The Information Commissioner
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 February 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Information, Public Interest Test, Legal Professional Privilege, Government Policy Exemptions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Department for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform
Appellant/claimant
Dermod O’Brien
First Respondent/defendant
The Information Commissioner
Second Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Information Tribunal erred in law in its approach to exemptions under sections 35 and 42 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000
- 2 Whether appropriate weight was given to the in-built public interest in legal professional privilege under section 42
- 3 Whether the Tribunal correctly applied the public interest balancing test under section 2(2)(b) FOIA
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal failed to give appropriate weight to the in-built public interest in withholding information to which legal professional privilege applies under section 42 FOIA. The Tribunal's decision ordering disclosure of documents subject to section 42 exemption is quashed and remitted to a differently constituted Tribunal for reconsideration. The Tribunal's decision regarding documents opposed on section 35 grounds is upheld.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Quashing of Tribunal's decision ordering disclosure of documents to which section 42 applies (B3, B4, B6, B7, B8, B12)
- Remittal of disclosure issue for section 42 documents to a differently constituted Tribunal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment