JML Direct Ltd v Freesat UK Ltd [2009] EWHC 616 (Ch) (26 March 2009)
Freesat did not breach its contractual obligations or the Ofcom Code in allocating EPG numbers to JML's channels. Freesat was entitled to attach no weight to the 'date of agreement' criterion across all genres due to practical difficulties and fairness, and its use of BARB ratings and Freeview presence as evidence for 'viewer convenience and expectations' was not irrational. The Listing Policy provided an objectively justifiable method, and Freesat's discretion was exercised within the permissible contractual and regulatory bounds.
- Citation
- [2009] EWHC 616 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: JML Direct Ltd; Defendant: Freesat UK Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 March 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Contract Dispute / Expedited Trial on Liability
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Contract, Exercise of Contractual Discretion, Electronic Programme Guide (epg) Allocation, Ofcom Code Compliance, Objectively Justifiable Allocation Methods
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
JML Direct Ltd
Claimant
Freesat UK Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Contract Dispute / Expedited Trial on Liability
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Freesat breached its contractual obligations in allocating EPG numbers to JML's shopping channels
- 2 Whether Freesat failed to comply with its Listing Policy and the Ofcom Code
- 3 Whether Freesat's exercise of discretion was irrational or otherwise objectionable
Ratio Decidendi
Freesat did not breach its contractual obligations or the Ofcom Code in allocating EPG numbers to JML's channels. Freesat was entitled to attach no weight to the 'date of agreement' criterion across all genres due to practical difficulties and fairness, and its use of BARB ratings and Freeview presence as evidence for 'viewer convenience and expectations' was not irrational. The Listing Policy provided an objectively justifiable method, and Freesat's discretion was exercised within the permissible contractual and regulatory bounds.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- No declarations granted; claim for breach of contract fails
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment