Frontier Systems Ltd (t/a Voiceflex) v Frip Finishing Ltd

Frontier Systems Ltd (t/a Voiceflex) v Frip Finishing Ltd

The contract required Frip to pay for services it actually used, not merely those made available. There was no sufficient evidence that Frip breached any express or implied contractual terms regarding system security or password management. The fraudulent calls were made by third parties, not Frip, and Frip had taken reasonable steps to secure its system. Therefore, Frip is not liable for the invoice rendered by Voiceflex for the fraudulent calls.

Parties
Claimant: Frontier Systems Ltd trading as Voiceflex; Defendant: Frip Finishing Ltd
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
10 June 2014
Procedural Posture
Civil (contract/commercial) / Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Judgment for the defendant
Legal Topics
Breach of Contract, Implied Terms, Fraudulent Use of Telecommunications Services, Interpretation of Contractual Terms, Liability for Third Party Acts
Contract Law Information Technology Law Telecommunications Law Breach of Contract Implied Terms Fraudulent Use of Telecommunications Services Interpretation of Contractual Terms Liability for Third Party Acts

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Frontier Systems Ltd trading as Voiceflex

Claimant

Frip Finishing Ltd

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil (contract/commercial) / Judgment After Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant is liable to pay for telephony services fraudulently used by third-party hackers
  2. 2 Whether the defendant breached express or implied contractual terms regarding system security
  3. 3 Whether the claimant is entitled to payment for services used by third parties

Ratio Decidendi

The contract required Frip to pay for services it actually used, not merely those made available. There was no sufficient evidence that Frip breached any express or implied contractual terms regarding system security or password management. The fraudulent calls were made by third parties, not Frip, and Frip had taken reasonable steps to secure its system. Therefore, Frip is not liable for the invoice rendered by Voiceflex for the fraudulent calls.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the defendant