Secretary of State for Education and Skills v Frontline Technology Ltd. [2004] EWHC 1563 (Patents) (28 July 2004)
Costs should be apportioned on an issue-by-issue basis, reflecting the parties' relative success and the time spent on each issue, with the claimant to pay the defendant 8% of the defendant's reasonable costs, subject to deductions for specific applications and late concessions.
- Citation
- [2004] EWHC 1563 (Patents)
- Parties
- Claimant: Secretary of State for Education and Skills; Defendant: Frontline Technology Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Patent Action / Post Trial Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Claimant to pay defendant 8% of defendant's reasonable costs, subject to deductions for specified applications and late concessions; all costs to be taxed if not agreed; no order as to costs for the hearing on the terms of the order and costs.
- Legal Topics
- Patents, Costs Orders, Inventive Step, Prior Art, Issue Based Costs Apportionment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Secretary of State for Education and Skills
Claimant
Frontline Technology Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Patent Action / Post Trial Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate apportionment of costs following partial success in a patent action
- 2 Application of issue-based costs orders under CPR 44.3
Ratio Decidendi
Costs should be apportioned on an issue-by-issue basis, reflecting the parties' relative success and the time spent on each issue, with the claimant to pay the defendant 8% of the defendant's reasonable costs, subject to deductions for specific applications and late concessions.
Court Disposition
Claimant to pay defendant 8% of defendant's reasonable costs, subject to deductions for specified applications and late concessions; all costs to be taxed if not agreed; no order as to costs for the hearing on the terms of the order and costs.
Orders
- Claimant to pay defendant 8% of defendant's reasonable costs in respect of the action, less: (a) 50% of claimant's costs of its application dated 13/14 January 2004; (b) 75% of claimant's costs of defendant's application dated 28 January 2004 (except as related to amendment of defence); (c) claimant's costs of...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment