Fun Camps Ltd & Ors v OFSTED [2003] EWCST 124(EY) (12 May 2003)

Fun Camps Ltd & Ors v OFSTED [2003] EWCST 124(EY) (12 May 2003)

OFSTED failed to meet the high threshold of proving the appellants acted unreasonably in bringing or conducting the proceedings; the appeal was withdrawn at the earliest opportunity after pleadings, and no findings of fact or impropriety were made.

Citation
[2003] EWCST 124
Parties
Appellant: Fun Camps Ltd; Appellant: Mr S O’Donahue; Appellant: Mr A James; Respondent: OFSTED
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
12 May 2003
Procedural Posture
Application for Costs / Post Withdrawal of Appeal
Outcome
no order as to costs
Legal Topics
Costs Orders, Unreasonable Conduct, Corporate Veil, Care Standards Tribunal Procedure
Administrative Law Child Care Regulation Costs Orders Unreasonable Conduct Corporate Veil Care Standards Tribunal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Fun Camps Ltd

Appellant

Mr S O’Donahue

Appellant

Mr A James

Appellant

OFSTED

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application for Costs / Post Withdrawal of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellants acted unreasonably in bringing or conducting the proceedings so as to justify a costs order under Regulation 33 of the 2002 Regulations
  2. 2 Whether conduct prior to initiation of proceedings is relevant to a costs order
  3. 3 Whether costs can be awarded for periods prior to commencement of proceedings

Ratio Decidendi

OFSTED failed to meet the high threshold of proving the appellants acted unreasonably in bringing or conducting the proceedings; the appeal was withdrawn at the earliest opportunity after pleadings, and no findings of fact or impropriety were made.

Court Disposition

no order as to costs