G v B

The application for summary return was refused because the children's welfare, degree of connection, and stability were overwhelmingly greater in England than Dubai. The mother’s mental health, uncertainty in Dubai law, risk of visa invalidation, and reliance on protective measures that may not be enforceable or timely, all weighed against return. The court found the children’s interests best served by remaining in England, with arrangements for contact and mediation.

Parties: Applicant: G; Respondent: B
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Judgment Date: 19 May 2025
Procedural Posture: Summary Return Order (children) / Final Judgment
Outcome: Application for summary return order refused; children to remain in England.
Legal Topics: Summary Return to Non Hague Convention State, Child Arrangements, Domestic Abuse Allegations, Jurisdiction, Welfare Principle

Family Law Child Welfare Summary Return to Non Hague Convention State Child Arrangements Domestic Abuse Allegations Jurisdiction Welfare Principle

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4

Parties

Applicant

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Summary Return Order (children) / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether a summary return order to Dubai should be granted for three children
2 Assessment of welfare and degree of connection to England vs Dubai
3 Impact of domestic abuse allegations and mental health on return

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Application for summary return order refused; children to remain in England.

Orders

Applicant's application for summary return order dismissed.
Interim contact order: Respondent to facilitate alternate weekend contact and division of holiday time for applicant.