GA v The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
The refusal of Universal Credit to the appellant, a victim of domestic violence with pre-settled status under Appendix EU, was unlawfully discriminatory contrary to Article 14 ECHR, and regulation 9(3)(c)(i) of the Universal Credit Regulations 2013 should be disapplied in her case.
- Parties
- Appellant: GA; First Respondent: The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions; Intervener: The Independent Monitoring Authority for the Citizens’ Rights Agreements
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Upper Tribunal Decision on Appeal From First Tier Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Universal Credit, Right to Reside, Discrimination Under Article 14 ECHR, Domestic Abuse Concession, Appendix EU, Appendix FM
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
GA
Appellant
The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
First Respondent
The Independent Monitoring Authority for the Citizens’ Rights Agreements
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Upper Tribunal Decision on Appeal From First Tier Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether refusal of Universal Credit to appellant with pre-settled status under Appendix EU was unlawfully discriminatory under Article 14 ECHR
- 2 Whether regulation 9(3)(c)(i) of Universal Credit Regulations 2013 should be disapplied in appellant's case
Ratio Decidendi
The refusal of Universal Credit to the appellant, a victim of domestic violence with pre-settled status under Appendix EU, was unlawfully discriminatory contrary to Article 14 ECHR, and regulation 9(3)(c)(i) of the Universal Credit Regulations 2013 should be disapplied in her case.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Decision of First-tier Tribunal set aside
- Appellant's appeal from Secretary of State's decision of 23 August 2022 allowed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment