Placito v Slater & Ors

Placito v Slater & Ors

The appeal was dismissed because the claimant failed to demonstrate special circumstances justifying release from his undertaking not to commence proceedings after a specified date. The court held that the undertaking was part of a consensual settlement, and the absence of prejudice or solicitor error did not amount to special circumstances. The striking out of the claim was not disproportionate or contrary to the overriding objective.

Parties
Appellant: Gabriel di Placito; Respondents: Slater & Ors
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
19 December 2003
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment Dismissing Action and Upholding Strike Out Order
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Consent Orders, Undertakings to Court, Abuse of Process, Strike Out Applications
Civil Procedure Probate and Succession Extension of Time Consent Orders Undertakings to Court Abuse of Process Strike Out Applications

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 23 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 13
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gabriel di Placito

Appellant

Slater & Ors

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment Dismissing Action and Upholding Strike Out Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the court should release the claimant from an undertaking not to commence proceedings after a specified date
  2. 2 Whether the claimant's action should be struck out as an abuse of process for breach of the undertaking
  3. 3 Whether the absence of prejudice and the short delay justified relief from the undertaking

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the claimant failed to demonstrate special circumstances justifying release from his undertaking not to commence proceedings after a specified date. The court held that the undertaking was part of a consensual settlement, and the absence of prejudice or solicitor error did not amount to special circumstances. The striking out of the claim was not disproportionate or contrary to the overriding objective.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed; action remains struck out as an abuse of process; no extension of time or release from undertaking granted