Gail Judson v The Information Commissioner & Anor

Gail Judson v The Information Commissioner & Anor

The appeal raises a triable issue regarding the application of regulation 12(4)(a) EIRs and the completeness of information disclosure, and is therefore fit for a full hearing; the strike out application is refused.

Parties
Appellant: Gail Judson; First Respondent: The Information Commissioner; Second Respondent: Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 September 2024
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Interlocutory Application (strike Out) and Directions
Outcome
strike out application refused; directions issued
Legal Topics
Environmental Information, Freedom of Information, Procedural Fairness, Strike Out Applications

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gail Judson

Appellant

The Information Commissioner

First Respondent

Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Interlocutory Application (strike Out) and Directions

  1. 1 Whether the appeal has a realistic prospect of success under rule 8(3)(c)
  2. 2 Whether the Decision Notice correctly applied regulation 12(4)(a) of the Environmental Information Regulations 2004
  3. 3 Whether all relevant information was disclosed by the public authority

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal raises a triable issue regarding the application of regulation 12(4)(a) EIRs and the completeness of information disclosure, and is therefore fit for a full hearing; the strike out application is refused.

Court Disposition

strike out application refused; directions issued

Orders

  • Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council joined as Second Respondent
  • Second Respondent to file and serve Response within 28 days