Gail Judson v The Information Commissioner & Anor
The appeal raises a triable issue regarding the application of regulation 12(4)(a) EIRs and the completeness of information disclosure, and is therefore fit for a full hearing; the strike out application is refused.
- Parties
- Appellant: Gail Judson; First Respondent: The Information Commissioner; Second Respondent: Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Interlocutory Application (strike Out) and Directions
- Outcome
- strike out application refused; directions issued
- Legal Topics
- Environmental Information, Freedom of Information, Procedural Fairness, Strike Out Applications
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gail Judson
Appellant
The Information Commissioner
First Respondent
Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Interlocutory Application (strike Out) and Directions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal has a realistic prospect of success under rule 8(3)(c)
- 2 Whether the Decision Notice correctly applied regulation 12(4)(a) of the Environmental Information Regulations 2004
- 3 Whether all relevant information was disclosed by the public authority
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal raises a triable issue regarding the application of regulation 12(4)(a) EIRs and the completeness of information disclosure, and is therefore fit for a full hearing; the strike out application is refused.
Court Disposition
strike out application refused; directions issued
Orders
- Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council joined as Second Respondent
- Second Respondent to file and serve Response within 28 days
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment