Frasca-Judd v Golovina [2016] EWHC 497 (QB) (05 February 2016)
On the proper construction of the tenancy agreement, the landlord covenanted to insure the property for the benefit of both parties, and the risk of loss from insured risks (including those caused by the tenant's breach or negligence) was allocated to the insurance policy. The landlord (and its insurer by...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] EWHC 497
- Parties
- Claimant: Elizabeth Ann Frasca-Judd; Defendant: Galina Golovina
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 February 2016
- Procedural Posture
- High Court Civil Claim (queen's Bench Division) / Judgment After Trial and Appeal on Summary Judgment/strike Out
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Subrogation, Allocation of Risk in Tenancy Agreements, Landlord's Covenant to Insure, Tenant Liability for Insured Risks, Construction of Tenancy Agreements, Negligence, Breach of Contract
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Elizabeth Ann Frasca-Judd
Claimant
Galina Golovina
Defendant
Procedural Posture
High Court Civil Claim (queen's Bench Division) / Judgment After Trial and Appeal on Summary Judgment/strike Out
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the landlord (or its insurer by subrogation) can recover damages from the tenant for loss caused by an insured risk (flood) where the tenancy agreement contains a landlord's covenant to insure for the benefit of both parties
- 2 Whether the terms of the tenancy agreement allocate risk such that the landlord's sole remedy is under the insurance policy and not against the tenant in damages for breach of contract or negligence
Ratio Decidendi
On the proper construction of the tenancy agreement, the landlord covenanted to insure the property for the benefit of both parties, and the risk of loss from insured risks (including those caused by the tenant's breach or negligence) was allocated to the insurance policy. The landlord (and its insurer by subrogation) is precluded from recovering damages from the tenant for such loss. The subrogated claim fails.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- Claimant's claim for damages against the defendant is dismissed.
- No order for damages against the defendant tenant for insured risk losses.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment