Gallastegui, R (on the application of) v Westminster City Council & Ors
Sections 143 and 145 of the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011 are compatible with Articles 6, 10, 11 and Article 1 of Protocol No 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights; the statutory scheme is prescribed by law, pursues legitimate aims, is proportionate, does not impose a blanket ban, and...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Gallastegui; Respondent: Westminster City Council & Ors; First Interested Party: Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis; Second Interested Party: Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 January 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Appeal From High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Expression, Freedom of Assembly, Proportionality, Prescribed by Law, Positive Obligations, Access to Courts
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gallastegui
Appellant
Westminster City Council & Ors
Respondent
Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis
First Interested Party
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Second Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal From High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Compatibility of sections 143 and 145 of the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011 with Articles 6, 10, 11 and Article 1 of Protocol No 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights
- 2 Whether the statutory scheme imposes a blanket ban on protests with tents
- 3 Whether the statutory interference is prescribed by law, pursues a legitimate aim, and is proportionate
Ratio Decidendi
Sections 143 and 145 of the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011 are compatible with Articles 6, 10, 11 and Article 1 of Protocol No 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights; the statutory scheme is prescribed by law, pursues legitimate aims, is proportionate, does not impose a blanket ban, and provides effective access to courts.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- No declaration of incompatibility granted
- Statutory scheme upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment