BMG (Mansfield) Ltd & Ors v Galliford Try Construction Ltd & Ors

BMG (Mansfield) Ltd & Ors v Galliford Try Construction Ltd & Ors

The Defendants are to pay 50% of the Claimants’ costs of the applications due to their over-aggressive and disproportionate opposition, but the Claimants are not entitled to recover costs related to their former expert, and must bear certain amendment-related costs themselves.

Parties
Claimant: BMG (Mansfield) Ltd; Claimant: The BMG (Mansfield) Ltd Partnership; Defendant: Galliford Try Construction Ltd; Defendant: Aedas Architects Ltd
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
15 November 2013
Procedural Posture
Civil / Costs Ruling After Application to Amend Particulars of Claim and Instruct New Expert
Outcome
Costs order made; Defendants to pay 50% of Claimants’ costs of applications, with further specific directions on costs allocation.
Legal Topics
Costs, Amendment of Pleadings, Expert Evidence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

BMG (Mansfield) Ltd

Claimant

The BMG (Mansfield) Ltd Partnership

Claimant

Galliford Try Construction Ltd

Defendant

Aedas Architects Ltd

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Costs Ruling After Application to Amend Particulars of Claim and Instruct New Expert

  1. 1 Entitlement to costs following application to amend Particulars of Claim and instruct a new expert
  2. 2 Appropriate allocation of costs between parties for various amendments and expert evidence

Ratio Decidendi

The Defendants are to pay 50% of the Claimants’ costs of the applications due to their over-aggressive and disproportionate opposition, but the Claimants are not entitled to recover costs related to their former expert, and must bear certain amendment-related costs themselves.

Court Disposition

Costs order made; Defendants to pay 50% of Claimants’ costs of applications, with further specific directions on costs allocation.

Orders

  • Defendants to pay 50% of Claimants’ costs of the applications, in equal shares, joint and several liability.
  • Claimants’ costs of instructing Mr. Streeter not recoverable.