Gareth Taylor v R
The sentencing judge was entitled to conclude that the applicant was dangerous and to impose an IPP sentence, having properly considered the statutory framework, the applicant's offending history, the pre-sentence and psychological reports, and the risk of serious harm to the public. The grounds of appeal are not reasonably arguable and there is no basis to extend time or grant leave to appeal.
- Parties
- Applicant: Gareth Taylor; Respondent: Rex
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- application refused
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Offences, Dangerous Offenders, Sentencing, Imprisonment for Public Protection, Assessment of Dangerousness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gareth Taylor
Applicant
Rex
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentencing judge correctly applied the statutory test of dangerousness under the Criminal Justice Act 2003
- 2 Whether the imposition of an indeterminate sentence of imprisonment for public protection (IPP) was wrong in principle or manifestly excessive
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge was entitled to conclude that the applicant was dangerous and to impose an IPP sentence, having properly considered the statutory framework, the applicant's offending history, the pre-sentence and psychological reports, and the risk of serious harm to the public. The grounds of appeal are not reasonably arguable and there is no basis to extend time or grant leave to appeal.
Court Disposition
application refused
Orders
- Extension of time for leave to appeal against sentence refused
- Leave to appeal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment