Bridle v Bridle

Bridle v Bridle

The circuit judge was wrong to require permission to appeal; the appellant had an absolute right of appeal as notice was filed in time. The order as sealed did not reflect the judgment and requires adjustment.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Appellant: Gary Albert Bridle; Respondent: Jane Ann Bridle
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
20 October 2010
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court to Court of Appeal
Outcome
appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Appeals, Ancillary Relief, Procedural Rules
Family Law Civil Procedure Appeals Ancillary Relief Procedural Rules

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gary Albert Bridle

Appellant

Jane Ann Bridle

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court to Court of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant required permission to appeal from the order of the District Judge in ancillary relief proceedings
  2. 2 Whether the order as sealed reflected the terms of the judgment

Ratio Decidendi

The circuit judge was wrong to require permission to appeal; the appellant had an absolute right of appeal as notice was filed in time. The order as sealed did not reflect the judgment and requires adjustment.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

  • Set aside the order of HHJ Tyzack QC
  • Transfer papers from Exeter to Bournemouth for rehearing