Micheal & Ors v Phillips & Ors [2017] EWHC 142 (QB) (02 February 2017)

Micheal & Ors v Phillips & Ors [2017] EWHC 142 (QB) (02 February 2017)

The First and Second Defendants were in serious and significant breach of the Unless Order for disclosure, including the destruction and non-disclosure of electronic and accounting records, with no good reason provided. The breaches prejudiced the Claimants' ability to prepare for trial. Relief from sanctions was refused and the Defence and Counterclaim were struck out; the Defendants were debarred from defending the claim.

Citation
[2017] EWHC 142 (QB)
Parties
Claimant: John Micheal; Claimant: Pauline Wendy Micheal; Claimant: Havering Radio Cars UK Limited; Defendant: Gary Anthony Phillips; Defendant: A1 Group (UK) Limited; Defendant: Lynn Phillips
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
02 February 2017
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application for Strike Out and Relief From Sanctions
Outcome
Defence and Counterclaim of First and Second Defendants struck out; First and Second Defendants debarred from defending the claim; application for relief from sanctions refused.
Legal Topics
Disclosure Obligations, Relief From Sanctions, Constructive Trust, Director's Duties, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Management Agreement, Electronic Evidence, Unless Order
Civil Procedure Company Law Equity and Trusts Disclosure Obligations Relief From Sanctions Constructive Trust Director's Duties Breach of Fiduciary Duty +3 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Micheal

Claimant

Pauline Wendy Micheal

Claimant

Havering Radio Cars UK Limited

Claimant

Gary Anthony Phillips

Defendant

A1 Group (UK) Limited

Defendant

Lynn Phillips

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Interlocutory Application for Strike Out and Relief From Sanctions

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the First and Second Defendants complied with the Unless Order for disclosure
  2. 2 Whether relief from sanctions should be granted to the First and Second Defendants
  3. 3 Whether Defence and Counterclaim should be struck out and Defendants debarred from defending

Ratio Decidendi

The First and Second Defendants were in serious and significant breach of the Unless Order for disclosure, including the destruction and non-disclosure of electronic and accounting records, with no good reason provided. The breaches prejudiced the Claimants' ability to prepare for trial. Relief from sanctions was refused and the Defence and Counterclaim were struck out; the Defendants were debarred from defending the claim.

Court Disposition

Defence and Counterclaim of First and Second Defendants struck out; First and Second Defendants debarred from defending the claim; application for relief from sanctions refused.

Orders

  • Defence and Counterclaim of First and Second Defendants struck out
  • First and Second Defendants debarred from defending the claim