R v Gary Anthony Reid

R v Gary Anthony Reid

The sentencing judge was entitled to categorise the offending as high culpability and category 1 harm due to the prolonged and persistent nature of the assault, the vulnerability of the victim, and the serious psychological and physical harm caused. The sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive and was within the appropriate range.

Parties
Prosecutor: Rex; Appellant: Gary Anthony Reid
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
31 March 2023
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm, Sentencing, Domestic Violence, Appeal Against Sentence
Criminal Law Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm Sentencing Domestic Violence Appeal Against Sentence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecutor

Gary Anthony Reid

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive
  2. 2 Proper categorisation of culpability and harm under sentencing guidelines

Ratio Decidendi

The sentencing judge was entitled to categorise the offending as high culpability and category 1 harm due to the prolonged and persistent nature of the assault, the vulnerability of the victim, and the serious psychological and physical harm caused. The sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive and was within the appropriate range.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Sentence of two years' imprisonment upheld