Ultraframe (UK) Ltd v Fielding & Ors [2005] EWHC 1638 (Ch) (27 July 2005)
The court found that Mr Fielding acted as a de facto and/or shadow director of Northstar and Seaquest, owed and breached fiduciary duties, and was involved in the misappropriation of business and assets from those companies to entities under his control. Key documents relied on by Mr Fielding were found to be fabricated or unreliable. The transfers of assets and intellectual property were not at arm's length, were not properly authorised, and were effected in breach of statutory and fiduciary duties. The Burnden Defendants, including Mrs Fielding and associated companies, were found liable for knowing receipt and dishonest assistance. Ultraframe was entitled to proprietary and personal...
- Citation
- [2005] EWHC 1638 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Ultraframe (UK) Ltd; Defendant: Gary Fielding; Defendant/claimant: Northstar Systems Limited; Defendant/claimant: Seaquest Systems Limited; Defendant: Alan Clayton; Defendant: Jeffrey Naden; Defendant: Sally Anne Fielding; Defendant: BCP Plastics Limited; Defendant/claimant: Burnden Group PLC; Defendant: Burnden Holdings (UK) Limited; Defendant: K2 Conservatory Roof Systems Limited; Part 20 Defendant: Edwin Birkett
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 July 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Consolidated Chancery Division Actions (multiple Claims and Counterclaims) / Judgment on Liability After Full Trial
- Outcome
- Judgment for Ultraframe (UK) Ltd on liability; Burnden Defendants found liable for breach of fiduciary duty, knowing receipt, and dishonest assistance.
- Legal Topics
- Directors' Duties, Shadow and De Facto Directors, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Knowing Receipt, Dishonest Assistance, Tracing, Remedies for Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Sale of Assets by Administrative Receiver, Intellectual Property Rights in Insolvency, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Forgery and Fabrication of Documents
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ultraframe (UK) Ltd
Claimant
Gary Fielding
Defendant
Northstar Systems Limited
Defendant/claimant
Seaquest Systems Limited
Defendant/claimant
Alan Clayton
Defendant
Jeffrey Naden
Defendant
Sally Anne Fielding
Defendant
BCP Plastics Limited
Defendant
Burnden Group PLC
Defendant/claimant
Burnden Holdings (UK) Limited
Defendant
K2 Conservatory Roof Systems Limited
Defendant
Edwin Birkett
Part 20 Defendant
Procedural Posture
Consolidated Chancery Division Actions (multiple Claims and Counterclaims) / Judgment on Liability After Full Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Fielding and associated parties breached fiduciary duties as de facto or shadow directors of Northstar and Seaquest
- 2 Whether assets and business of Northstar and Seaquest were misappropriated by Mr Fielding and Burnden Group
- 3 Whether documents relied on by Mr Fielding were fabricated or forged
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that Mr Fielding acted as a de facto and/or shadow director of Northstar and Seaquest, owed and breached fiduciary duties, and was involved in the misappropriation of business and assets from those companies to entities under his control. Key documents relied on by Mr Fielding were found to be fabricated or unreliable. The transfers of assets and intellectual property were not at arm's length, were not properly authorised, and were effected in breach of statutory and fiduciary duties. The Burnden Defendants, including Mrs Fielding and associated companies, were found liable for knowing receipt and dishonest assistance. Ultraframe was entitled to proprietary and personal...
Court Disposition
Judgment for Ultraframe (UK) Ltd on liability; Burnden Defendants found liable for breach of fiduciary duty, knowing receipt, and dishonest assistance.
Orders
- Declaration that Mr Fielding and associated parties breached fiduciary duties as de facto/shadow directors
- Declaration that asset and business transfers from Northstar and Seaquest to Burnden Group were voidable and/or held on constructive trust for claimants
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment