Ultraframe UK Ltd v Fielding & Ors
The most efficient and cost-effective course is to adjourn the interlocutory applications to be heard with the main trial in October, as separate hearings would not result in substantial savings and could lead to appeals and inefficiency.
- Parties
- Claimant: Ultraframe UK Limited; Defendant: Gary John Fielding; Defendant: Sally Anne Fielding; Defendant: The Burnden Group; Interested Party: Liquidators of North Star Systems Ltd. and Seaquest Systems Ltd.
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 January 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Case Management Conference; Application to Adjourn Interlocutory Applications
- Outcome
- Interlocutory applications adjourned to be heard with the main trial.
- Legal Topics
- Case Management, Summary Judgment, Strike Out Applications, Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ultraframe UK Limited
Claimant
Gary John Fielding
Defendant
Sally Anne Fielding
Defendant
The Burnden Group
Defendant
Liquidators of North Star Systems Ltd. and Seaquest Systems Ltd.
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Civil / Case Management Conference; Application to Adjourn Interlocutory Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether interlocutory applications for summary judgment and strike out should be heard in March or adjourned to be heard with the main trial in October
Ratio Decidendi
The most efficient and cost-effective course is to adjourn the interlocutory applications to be heard with the main trial in October, as separate hearings would not result in substantial savings and could lead to appeals and inefficiency.
Court Disposition
Interlocutory applications adjourned to be heard with the main trial.
Orders
- March applications for summary judgment and strike out are adjourned to be determined with the conjoined trials in October.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment