Smith & Anor v Collett
The judge was entitled to apply a 15% discount for contingencies to the claimant's future loss of earnings, given the exceptionally strong evidence of his likely career trajectory and the need to balance the risk of underachievement with the possibility of even greater success. The salary increases and uplifts applied were justified on the evidence. The appeal is dismissed.
- Parties
- Appellant: Gary Smith & Anr; Respondent: Ben Collett
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 June 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Assessment of Damages, Loss of Future Earnings, Professional Sports Injuries
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gary Smith & Anr
Appellant
Ben Collett
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate discount to apply for contingencies in assessing future loss of earnings for a professional footballer?
- 2 Was the judge entitled to find that the claimant would have achieved a career at Championship level or higher?
- 3 Were the uplifts and salary increases applied by the judge justified by the evidence?
Ratio Decidendi
The judge was entitled to apply a 15% discount for contingencies to the claimant's future loss of earnings, given the exceptionally strong evidence of his likely career trajectory and the need to balance the risk of underachievement with the possibility of even greater success. The salary increases and uplifts applied were justified on the evidence. The appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Judge's award of £3,854,328 for future loss of earnings confirmed
- No adjustment to salary increases or uplifts applied by the trial judge
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment