Gary Withers v The Commissioners for HMRC
The Tribunal found that the grazing land and Woodland Trust land were used for separate, self-standing commercial and ecological purposes, not as an appendage to the dwelling. Therefore, these areas did not form part of the 'garden or grounds' of the residential property under section 116(1)(b) Finance Act 2003. The property was not wholly residential, and the appeal was allowed.
- Parties
- Appellant: Gary Withers; Respondents: The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 February 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Stamp Duty Land Tax, Residential Property Definition, Mixed Use Property, Finance Act 2003
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gary Withers
Appellant
The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the property purchased was wholly residential or included non-residential land for SDLT purposes
- 2 Whether the grazing and Woodland Trust land formed part of the 'garden or grounds' of the dwelling under section 116(1)(b) Finance Act 2003
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the grazing land and Woodland Trust land were used for separate, self-standing commercial and ecological purposes, not as an appendage to the dwelling. Therefore, these areas did not form part of the 'garden or grounds' of the residential property under section 116(1)(b) Finance Act 2003. The property was not wholly residential, and the appeal was allowed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The closure notice increasing SDLT to £212,500 is set aside.
- The property is to be treated as mixed-use for SDLT purposes.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment