Rotam Agrochemical Company Ltd & Anor v GAT Microencapsulation GmbH

Rotam Agrochemical Company Ltd & Anor v GAT Microencapsulation GmbH

GAT is the successful party as a matter of substance and reality, having substantially denied Rotam the prize it sought. Rotam's recovery was minimal compared to its claim and costs. However, GAT's failure on unjust enrichment, abandonment of Austrian law, and conduct in disclosure warrant a significant reduction. The appropriate order is that Rotam pay 50% of GAT's costs, assessed on the standard basis.

Parties
Claimant: Rotam Agrochemical Company Limited; Claimant: Rotam Agrochem International Company Limited; Defendant: GAT Microencapsulation GmbH (formerly GAT Microencapsulation AG)
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
08 November 2018
Procedural Posture
Commercial / Costs Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Rotam to pay 50% of GAT's costs, assessed on the standard basis.
Legal Topics
Costs, Unjust Enrichment, Contract, Tortious Misrepresentation
Civil Procedure Commercial Law Costs Unjust Enrichment Contract Tortious Misrepresentation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rotam Agrochemical Company Limited

Claimant

Rotam Agrochem International Company Limited

Claimant

GAT Microencapsulation GmbH (formerly GAT Microencapsulation AG)

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial / Costs Judgment After Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Who is the successful party for the purposes of costs under CPR 44.2
  2. 2 What is the appropriate costs order given partial success and conduct of the parties

Ratio Decidendi

GAT is the successful party as a matter of substance and reality, having substantially denied Rotam the prize it sought. Rotam's recovery was minimal compared to its claim and costs. However, GAT's failure on unjust enrichment, abandonment of Austrian law, and conduct in disclosure warrant a significant reduction. The appropriate order is that Rotam pay 50% of GAT's costs, assessed on the standard basis.

Court Disposition

Rotam to pay 50% of GAT's costs, assessed on the standard basis.

Orders

  • Rotam to pay 50% of GAT's costs, to be assessed on the standard basis.
  • Payment on account of costs to be agreed or determined by the court if not agreed.