Gateley Manchester LLP v Rose & Anor [2013] EWCA Civ 401 (05 March 2013)
The preliminary issue procedure was inappropriate as the issues were too factually entangled for separate determination; the District Judge's order was confused and did not justly resolve the dispute. The matter should be remitted for trial with proper directions.
- Citation
- [2013] EWCA Civ 401
- Parties
- Respondent: Gateley Manchester LLP; Applicants: Rose & Anr
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 March 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Preliminary Issue Determination in Manchester County Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; order below set aside; matter remitted to Manchester County Court for trial; costs awarded to appellants.
- Legal Topics
- Assignment of Debts, Preliminary Issues, Costs Orders, Jurisdiction, Interpretation of Deeds
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gateley Manchester LLP
Respondent
Rose & Anr
Applicants
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Preliminary Issue Determination in Manchester County Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Deed of Assignment was sufficient to transfer the alleged debt and right to sue to Gateley
- 2 Whether the Deed permitted recovery of counsel's fees
- 3 Whether agreements pleaded by the appellants were made and their terms
Ratio Decidendi
The preliminary issue procedure was inappropriate as the issues were too factually entangled for separate determination; the District Judge's order was confused and did not justly resolve the dispute. The matter should be remitted for trial with proper directions.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; order below set aside; matter remitted to Manchester County Court for trial; costs awarded to appellants.
Orders
- Gateley to pay £3,508 plus VAT for first instance costs, subject to recalculation of VAT.
- Gateley to pay £8,000 inclusive of VAT for appeal costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment