Gateley Manchester LLP v Rose & Anor

Gateley Manchester LLP v Rose & Anor

The preliminary issue procedure was inappropriate as the issues could not be determined without a full trial of facts. The appeal was allowed, the order below set aside, and the matter remitted to the County Court for trial with appropriate directions.

Parties
Respondent: Gateley Manchester LLP; Applicants: Rose & Anr
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
05 March 2013
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Preliminary Issue Determination
Outcome
Appeal allowed; order below set aside; matter remitted for trial; costs awarded to appellants.
Legal Topics
Assignment of Debts, Preliminary Issues, Costs, Jurisdiction

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gateley Manchester LLP

Respondent

Rose & Anr

Applicants

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Preliminary Issue Determination

  1. 1 Whether the Deed of Assignment was sufficient to transfer the alleged debt and right to bring proceedings to Gateley
  2. 2 Whether the Deed of Assignment enabled Gateley to recover counsel's fees incurred by Halliwells on behalf of the defendants
  3. 3 Whether agreements referred to in the Defence were made and their terms

Ratio Decidendi

The preliminary issue procedure was inappropriate as the issues could not be determined without a full trial of facts. The appeal was allowed, the order below set aside, and the matter remitted to the County Court for trial with appropriate directions.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; order below set aside; matter remitted for trial; costs awarded to appellants.

Orders

  • Gateley to pay appellants £3,508 plus VAT for costs below.
  • Gateley to pay appellants £8,000 inclusive of VAT for appeal costs.