Wilson, R. v [2018] EWCA Crim 1352 (15 March 2018)
The directions on hearsay, expert, and background evidence, though not ideal, did not amount to material misdirection or render the conviction unsafe; the sentence was justified by the aggravating features of domestic violence and use of a knife, and was not manifestly excessive.
- Citation
- [2018] EWCA Crim 1352
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Applicant: Gavin Arthur Wilson
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 March 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- renewed application for leave to appeal against conviction and sentence dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Hearsay Evidence, Bad Character Evidence, Expert Evidence, Domestic Violence, Sentencing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Gavin Arthur Wilson
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the jury was misdirected on hearsay evidence
- 2 Whether inadmissible expert evidence was adduced
- 3 Whether hearsay evidence from Angela Burgess was improperly admitted
Ratio Decidendi
The directions on hearsay, expert, and background evidence, though not ideal, did not amount to material misdirection or render the conviction unsafe; the sentence was justified by the aggravating features of domestic violence and use of a knife, and was not manifestly excessive.
Court Disposition
renewed application for leave to appeal against conviction and sentence dismissed
Orders
- Leave to appeal against conviction refused
- Leave to appeal against sentence refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment