Wilson, R. v
The directions on hearsay and expert evidence, though not perfect, did not amount to material misdirection affecting the safety of the conviction. The background of domestic violence was a proper aggravating factor in setting the minimum term for murder. The grounds of appeal were not properly arguable and the sentence was not manifestly excessive.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Regina; Applicant: Gavin Arthur Wilson
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 March 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- renewed application for leave to appeal against conviction and sentence dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Hearsay Evidence, Bad Character Evidence, Domestic Violence, Sentencing, Expert Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecutor
Gavin Arthur Wilson
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge misdirected the jury on hearsay evidence and its limitations
- 2 Whether inadmissible expert evidence was adduced by the prosecution
- 3 Whether the prosecution improperly introduced hearsay evidence from Angela Burgess
Ratio Decidendi
The directions on hearsay and expert evidence, though not perfect, did not amount to material misdirection affecting the safety of the conviction. The background of domestic violence was a proper aggravating factor in setting the minimum term for murder. The grounds of appeal were not properly arguable and the sentence was not manifestly excessive.
Court Disposition
renewed application for leave to appeal against conviction and sentence dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment