GB v R.

GB v R.

The appellant's conviction is unsafe because, as a credible victim of trafficking, her offending was integral to and a direct consequence of her exploitation; she was under a level of compulsion that extinguished her culpability; following the change in law and prosecutorial guidance, it was not in the public interest to prosecute her, and upholding the conviction would cause substantial injustice, particularly regarding her immigration status.

Parties
Appellant: GB; Respondent: R
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
16 January 2020
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Conviction, Following CCRC Referral
Outcome
conviction quashed
Legal Topics
Trafficking in Persons, Abuse of Process, Fresh Evidence, Change of Law, Asylum, Deportation, Public Interest in Prosecution, Guilty Plea by Trafficking Victim
Criminal Law Immigration Law Human Rights Law Trafficking in Persons Abuse of Process Fresh Evidence Change of Law Asylum +3 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 21 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

GB

Appellant

R

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Conviction, Following CCRC Referral

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant's conviction for possession of false identity documents with intent is unsafe in light of her status as a victim of trafficking and subsequent changes in law and prosecutorial guidance
  2. 2 Whether a substantial injustice would result if the conviction were upheld, given the change in law and its impact on her immigration status
  3. 3 Whether the nexus between the offence and the trafficking experience extinguished or significantly diminished her culpability

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant's conviction is unsafe because, as a credible victim of trafficking, her offending was integral to and a direct consequence of her exploitation; she was under a level of compulsion that extinguished her culpability; following the change in law and prosecutorial guidance, it was not in the public interest to prosecute her, and upholding the conviction would cause substantial injustice, particularly regarding her immigration status.

Court Disposition

conviction quashed

Orders

  • The appellant's conviction is quashed.
  • An order for anonymity is granted and maintained.