HM Attorney-General v Ebert [2001] EWHC Admin 695 (21st September, 2001)
Mr Ebert's conduct has repeatedly disrupted court proceedings and wasted judicial resources; previous orders have not sufficed. The court has inherent jurisdiction to grant injunctive relief to protect the administration of justice, and such relief is proportionate and does not unlawfully restrict Mr Ebert's right of access to the court.
- Citation
- [2001] EWHC Admin 695
- Parties
- Claimant: HM Attorney-General; Defendant: Gedaljahu Ebert
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Injunctive Relief Against Vexatious Litigant / Final Judgment and Order
- Outcome
- Injunction granted
- Legal Topics
- Vexatious Litigants, Injunctions, Court Administration, Access to Justice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
HM Attorney-General
Claimant
Gedaljahu Ebert
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application for Injunctive Relief Against Vexatious Litigant / Final Judgment and Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether further injunctive relief should be granted to restrain Mr Ebert's disruptive conduct in the Royal Courts of Justice
- 2 Whether the court has jurisdiction to grant such relief
- 3 Whether the relief sought is proportionate and compatible with Article 6 ECHR
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Ebert's conduct has repeatedly disrupted court proceedings and wasted judicial resources; previous orders have not sufficed. The court has inherent jurisdiction to grant injunctive relief to protect the administration of justice, and such relief is proportionate and does not unlawfully restrict Mr Ebert's right of access to the court.
Court Disposition
Injunction granted
Orders
- Mr Ebert forbidden from entering Royal Courts of Justice except for permitted hearings or with express permission.
- Mr Ebert forbidden from communicating with court staff except for formal applications as specified.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment