Gedeon Richter Plc v Bayer Pharma AG
The amendments to the patents did not constitute added matter as the parent application disclosed, explicitly and implicitly, that rapid dissolution could be achieved by any known method, not limited to micronisation or spraying. The patents were not invalid for obviousness because the prior art did not provide sufficient encouragement or expectation of success to try immediate release formulations; the inventive step was not obvious to the skilled person.
- Parties
- Appellant: Gedeon Richter plc; Respondent: Bayer Pharma AG
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 March 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (patents Court)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Added Matter, Obviousness, Pharmaceutical Patents, Patent Amendment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gedeon Richter plc
Appellant
Bayer Pharma AG
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (patents Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the amendments to patents EP (UK) Nos. 1,380,301 and 1,598,069 constitute added matter
- 2 Whether the patents are invalid for obviousness over prior art
Ratio Decidendi
The amendments to the patents did not constitute added matter as the parent application disclosed, explicitly and implicitly, that rapid dissolution could be achieved by any known method, not limited to micronisation or spraying. The patents were not invalid for obviousness because the prior art did not provide sufficient encouragement or expectation of success to try immediate release formulations; the inventive step was not obvious to the skilled person.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal on added matter dismissed
- Appeal on obviousness dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment