Hospira UK Ltd v Genentech Inc
Both the 115 and 455 patents are invalid. The 115 patent is obvious over the FDA label and common general knowledge; if not obvious, it would be insufficient and not entitled to priority. The 455 patent lacks novelty over Andya and is obvious over Waterside and common general knowledge. Hospira's proposed formulations with >24.5% acidic variants do not infringe the 455 patent.
- Parties
- Claimant: Hospira UK Limited; Defendant: Genentech Inc.
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 April 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Patent Invalidity and Non Infringement Proceedings / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Both patents declared invalid; declaration of non-infringement granted for specified Hospira products.
- Legal Topics
- Patent Validity, Obviousness, Sufficiency, Priority, Novelty, Non Infringement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hospira UK Limited
Claimant
Genentech Inc.
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Patent Invalidity and Non Infringement Proceedings / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether EP 1 210 115 and EP 1 308 455 patents are invalid for obviousness, insufficiency, or lack of novelty
- 2 Whether the patents are entitled to priority
- 3 Whether Hospira's proposed products infringe the 455 patent
Ratio Decidendi
Both the 115 and 455 patents are invalid. The 115 patent is obvious over the FDA label and common general knowledge; if not obvious, it would be insufficient and not entitled to priority. The 455 patent lacks novelty over Andya and is obvious over Waterside and common general knowledge. Hospira's proposed formulations with >24.5% acidic variants do not infringe the 455 patent.
Court Disposition
Both patents declared invalid; declaration of non-infringement granted for specified Hospira products.
Orders
- EP 1 210 115 and EP 1 308 455 patents declared invalid.
- Declaration of non-infringement granted for Hospira's trastuzumab formulations with 25%-29% acidic variants.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment