DP v General Dental Council
Section 27A(11) of the Dentists Act 1984 confers a right on registrants, from 13 April 2016, to seek review of any warning issued by the Investigating Committee within two years of the determination, including those issued before 13 April 2016. The statutory wording contains no limitation restricting the review power to warnings issued after that date, and the limited retroactivity does not result in unfairness or absurdity.
- Parties
- Claimant: DP; Defendant: General Dental Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 December 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application for judicial review allowed
- Legal Topics
- Retrospective Application of Statutes, Internal Review of Regulatory Decisions, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
DP
Claimant
General Dental Council
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether section 27A(11) of the Dentists Act 1984 permits review of warnings issued by the Investigating Committee prior to 13 April 2016
- 2 Whether the GDC's Guidance impermissibly restricts the statutory review power
Ratio Decidendi
Section 27A(11) of the Dentists Act 1984 confers a right on registrants, from 13 April 2016, to seek review of any warning issued by the Investigating Committee within two years of the determination, including those issued before 13 April 2016. The statutory wording contains no limitation restricting the review power to warnings issued after that date, and the limited retroactivity does not result in unfairness or absurdity.
Court Disposition
Application for judicial review allowed
Orders
- The GDC's decision dated 20 May 2016 is quashed.
- Paragraph 4(iii) of the Guidance is quashed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment