Kashif v General Medical Council

Kashif v General Medical Council

Given the narrowing of allegations and the current evidence, continuation of the interim suspension order is disproportionate; appeal allowed and suspension discharged.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Claimant: Dr Adeela Kashif; Defendant: General Medical Council
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
18 October 2013
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal Against Interim Suspension Order
Outcome
Appeal allowed; interim suspension order discharged
Legal Topics
Interim Suspension, Fitness to Practise, Proportionality, Costs
Administrative Law Medical Law Interim Suspension Fitness to Practise Proportionality Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dr Adeela Kashif

Claimant

General Medical Council

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Appeal Against Interim Suspension Order

  1. 1 Whether continuation of interim suspension order is proportionate
  2. 2 Whether narrowed allegations justify suspension
  3. 3 Appropriate application of legal principles under Medical Act 1983

Ratio Decidendi

Given the narrowing of allegations and the current evidence, continuation of the interim suspension order is disproportionate; appeal allowed and suspension discharged.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; interim suspension order discharged

Orders

  • Suspension order discharged
  • Costs awarded to claimant; total reduced to £8,500