Kashif v General Medical Council
Given the narrowing of allegations and the current evidence, continuation of the interim suspension order is disproportionate; appeal allowed and suspension discharged.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: Dr Adeela Kashif; Defendant: General Medical Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 October 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Appeal Against Interim Suspension Order
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; interim suspension order discharged
- Legal Topics
- Interim Suspension, Fitness to Practise, Proportionality, Costs
Administrative Law Medical Law Interim Suspension Fitness to Practise Proportionality Costs
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Dr Adeela Kashif
Claimant
General Medical Council
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal Against Interim Suspension Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether continuation of interim suspension order is proportionate
- 2 Whether narrowed allegations justify suspension
- 3 Appropriate application of legal principles under Medical Act 1983
Ratio Decidendi
Given the narrowing of allegations and the current evidence, continuation of the interim suspension order is disproportionate; appeal allowed and suspension discharged.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; interim suspension order discharged
Orders
- Suspension order discharged
- Costs awarded to claimant; total reduced to £8,500
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment