Shanker, R (on the application of) v General Medical Council
All grounds of appeal lacked substance: notice was properly served, the Committee had jurisdiction to order further assessment, the Committee was properly constituted, and the Committee was entitled to rely on the evidence of Dr Norris. The appeal was dismissed and costs awarded to the respondent.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: Dr Kailash Shanker; Defendant: General Medical Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 February 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Appeal From Professional Regulatory Committee
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Professional Discipline, Procedural Fairness, Jurisdiction of Regulatory Bodies, Committee Constitution, Costs
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dr Kailash Shanker
Claimant
General Medical Council
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal From Professional Regulatory Committee
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether adequate notice of the resumed hearing was given to the claimant
- 2 Whether the Committee had jurisdiction to order a further assessment
- 3 Whether the Committee was properly constituted under the relevant rules
Ratio Decidendi
All grounds of appeal lacked substance: notice was properly served, the Committee had jurisdiction to order further assessment, the Committee was properly constituted, and the Committee was entitled to rely on the evidence of Dr Norris. The appeal was dismissed and costs awarded to the respondent.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Claimant to pay respondent's costs in the sum of £4,000
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment