Kamel, R (on the application of) v General Medical Council
The Panel was empowered to extend Dr Kamel's suspension solely on the basis that he had failed to comply with a direction for assessment and had previously been suspended for that reason; no fresh finding of impairment or inquiry into the merits was required.
- Parties
- Claimant: The Queen on the application of Kamel; Defendant: General Medical Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 February 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Appeal From Fitness to Practise Panel Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Professional Regulation, Fitness to Practise, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Queen on the application of Kamel
Claimant
General Medical Council
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal From Fitness to Practise Panel Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Fitness to Practise Panel had statutory power to extend Dr Kamel's suspension under the Medical Act 1983 as amended
- 2 Whether the Panel was required to find Dr Kamel's fitness to practise impaired before extending suspension
- 3 Whether the Panel should have considered the merits of the underlying allegations or the reasonableness of the requirements imposed
Ratio Decidendi
The Panel was empowered to extend Dr Kamel's suspension solely on the basis that he had failed to comply with a direction for assessment and had previously been suspended for that reason; no fresh finding of impairment or inquiry into the merits was required.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment