Dastagir v General Medical Council
The court determined whether the General Medical Council's decision met the standards of legality, rationality, and procedural fairness required by law.
- Parties
- Claimant: Mohamed Abdul Jaleel Dastagir; Defendant: General Medical Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 31 March 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment delivered; outcome not specified in provided text.
- Legal Topics
- Professional Regulation, Judicial Review
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Mohamed Abdul Jaleel Dastagir
Claimant
General Medical Council
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the decision of the General Medical Council was lawful
Ratio Decidendi
The court determined whether the General Medical Council's decision met the standards of legality, rationality, and procedural fairness required by law.
Court Disposition
Judgment delivered; outcome not specified in provided text.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment