Gilthorpe v General Medical Council
The court has no power to extend the statutory time limit for lodging an appeal under section 40 of the Medical Act 1983. Dr Herrera did not lodge a valid appeal within the required 28 days, and his attempt to file a judicial review claim did not constitute a valid statutory appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: Dr Herrera-Gilthorpe (Dr Herrera); Defendant: General Medical Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 February 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Statutory Appeal (medical Disciplinary) / Judgment on Appeal Out of Time and Costs
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction; costs awarded to GMC at 25% of claimed amount.
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Appeals, Extension of Time, Costs Orders, Medical Practitioner Suspension
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dr Herrera-Gilthorpe (Dr Herrera)
Claimant
General Medical Council
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Statutory Appeal (medical Disciplinary) / Judgment on Appeal Out of Time and Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court has jurisdiction to extend time for lodging a statutory appeal under the Medical Act 1983
- 2 Whether Dr Herrera lodged a valid appeal within the statutory time limit
- 3 Whether costs should be awarded and in what proportion
Ratio Decidendi
The court has no power to extend the statutory time limit for lodging an appeal under section 40 of the Medical Act 1983. Dr Herrera did not lodge a valid appeal within the required 28 days, and his attempt to file a judicial review claim did not constitute a valid statutory appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction; costs awarded to GMC at 25% of claimed amount.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed as out of time and not validly constituted.
- Dr Herrera to pay 25% of GMC's costs, assessed at £10,194.84.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment