General Pharmaceutical Council v Ilyk

General Pharmaceutical Council v Ilyk

Given the gravity of the allegations, risk to public confidence, lack of cooperation from the respondent, and ongoing investigation, it is appropriate to extend the interim suspension order for eight months.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Applicant: General Pharmaceutical Council; Respondent: ILYK
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
24 October 2017
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Application for Extension of Interim Suspension Order
Outcome
application granted
Legal Topics
Interim Suspension, Fitness to Practise, Public Protection
Professional Regulation Administrative Law Interim Suspension Fitness to Practise Public Protection

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

General Pharmaceutical Council

Applicant

ILYK

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Application for Extension of Interim Suspension Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether to extend the interim suspension order against the respondent under Art. 56(5) of the Pharmacy Order 2010

Ratio Decidendi

Given the gravity of the allegations, risk to public confidence, lack of cooperation from the respondent, and ongoing investigation, it is appropriate to extend the interim suspension order for eight months.

Court Disposition

application granted

Orders

  • Interim suspension order extended for eight months