Eli Lilly And Co & Ors v Genetech Inc
Permission is refused because Lilly failed to comply with mandatory procedural requirements for admission of experimental evidence, causing prejudice to Genetech and disregarding court orders and established practice.
- Parties
- Claimant: Eli Lilly and Company; Claimant: Lilly France SAS; Claimant: Lilly Deutschland GmbH; Claimant: Eli Lilly Italia SPA; Claimant: Eli Lilly and Co (Ireland) Limited; Claimant: Eli Lilly Kinsale Limited; Claimant: Lilly SA; Claimant: Eli Lilly and Company Limited; Defendant: Genetech, Inc
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 December 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Patent / Pre Trial Review
- Outcome
- permission refused
- Legal Topics
- Admissibility of Experimental Evidence, Procedural Compliance, Litigation Practice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Eli Lilly and Company
Claimant
Lilly France SAS
Claimant
Lilly Deutschland GmbH
Claimant
Eli Lilly Italia SPA
Claimant
Eli Lilly and Co (Ireland) Limited
Claimant
Eli Lilly Kinsale Limited
Claimant
Lilly SA
Claimant
Eli Lilly and Company Limited
Claimant
Genetech, Inc
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Patent / Pre Trial Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Lilly should be granted permission to rely on Novartis experiments conducted for EPO proceedings without complying with court procedure
Ratio Decidendi
Permission is refused because Lilly failed to comply with mandatory procedural requirements for admission of experimental evidence, causing prejudice to Genetech and disregarding court orders and established practice.
Court Disposition
permission refused
Orders
- Lilly is refused permission to rely on the Novartis experiments in these proceedings.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment