R v Geoffrey Butler
The overall sentence of three years and ten weeks' imprisonment was not manifestly excessive given the aggravating factors and the inherent harm in intentional strangulation. The sentencing approach was appropriate, and the appeal is dismissed.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Rex; Appellant: Geoffrey Butler
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm, Intentional Strangulation, Breach of Non Molestation Order, Domestic Violence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecutor
Geoffrey Butler
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the overall sentence of three years and ten weeks' imprisonment was manifestly excessive
- 2 Proper categorisation of the assault occasioning actual bodily harm offence under sentencing guidelines
- 3 Appropriate sentencing approach where intentional strangulation and assault occasioning actual bodily harm are charged together
Ratio Decidendi
The overall sentence of three years and ten weeks' imprisonment was not manifestly excessive given the aggravating factors and the inherent harm in intentional strangulation. The sentencing approach was appropriate, and the appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Sentence of three years and ten weeks' imprisonment upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment