Rees, R. v [2023] EWCA Crim 487 (19 April 2023)
The convictions are unsafe because the judge's indication regarding sentence, given in the absence of the defendant and outside the proper Goodyear procedure, created impermissible pressure on the appellant to plead guilty, undermining the safety of the convictions.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] EWCA Crim 487
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Appellant: Geordan Anthony Rees
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 April 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Convictions quashed; no retrial ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Unsafe Conviction, Guilty Plea Pressure, Judicial Indication of Sentence, Goodyear Indication, Procedural Fairness
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Geordan Anthony Rees
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant's guilty pleas were entered under impermissible pressure from the judge and defence counsel
- 2 Whether the judge's indication regarding sentence rendered the convictions unsafe
Ratio Decidendi
The convictions are unsafe because the judge's indication regarding sentence, given in the absence of the defendant and outside the proper Goodyear procedure, created impermissible pressure on the appellant to plead guilty, undermining the safety of the convictions.
Court Disposition
Convictions quashed; no retrial ordered.
Orders
- Convictions quashed
- No retrial to be held
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment