Croudace, R v

Croudace, R v

The original sentence was manifestly excessive due to errors in categorisation, double-counting of aggravating factors, and arithmetical mistakes in applying the guilty plea discount. The correct total sentence, applying the proper guidelines and totality, is six-and-a-half years' imprisonment.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Prosecutor: Regina; Appellant: George Croudace
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 October 2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
appeal allowed; sentence reduced
Legal Topics
Sexual Offences, Sentencing, Child Protection, Indecent Images, Abuse of Trust
Criminal Law Sexual Offences Sentencing Child Protection Indecent Images Abuse of Trust

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecutor

George Croudace

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive or wrong in principle
  2. 2 Whether the sentencing judge erred in categorisation and calculation of sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines
  3. 3 Whether there was double-counting of aggravating factors

Ratio Decidendi

The original sentence was manifestly excessive due to errors in categorisation, double-counting of aggravating factors, and arithmetical mistakes in applying the guilty plea discount. The correct total sentence, applying the proper guidelines and totality, is six-and-a-half years' imprisonment.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed; sentence reduced

Orders

  • Sentence of nine-and-a-half years' imprisonment quashed
  • Sentence of six-and-a-half years' imprisonment imposed