Webb, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 152 (26 January 2011)

Webb, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 152 (26 January 2011)

Given the exceptional mitigating circumstances, including the applicant's diminished responsibility, age, previous good character, and the nature of the offence as a mercy killing, the sentence should be reduced to twelve months' imprisonment, suspended for twelve months, with a supervision order.

Citation
[2011] EWCA Crim 152
Parties
Prosecution: Regina; Applicant: George Hugh Webb
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
26 January 2011
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Manslaughter, Diminished Responsibility, Mercy Killing, Sentencing, Assisted Suicide

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecution

George Hugh Webb

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed for manslaughter on grounds of diminished responsibility was excessive given the mitigating circumstances
  2. 2 Appropriate sentencing approach for mercy killings involving diminished responsibility

Ratio Decidendi

Given the exceptional mitigating circumstances, including the applicant's diminished responsibility, age, previous good character, and the nature of the offence as a mercy killing, the sentence should be reduced to twelve months' imprisonment, suspended for twelve months, with a supervision order.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

  • Sentence reduced to twelve months' imprisonment, suspended for twelve months.
  • Supervision order for twelve months under responsible officer in Rotherham.