VICTOR PISANTE v GEORGE LOGOTHETIS
Mr Logothetis, acting for Libra, made a false representation to Mr Pisante that Lomar would contribute US$40 million in 'cash and ships' as equity to the KKR joint venture, when in fact only ships were contributed and Lomar took cash out. This misrepresentation was made knowingly or recklessly, induced Swindon to roll over its ICBC cash and surrender ETFA 2 for a 30% derivative interest, and caused loss. Swindon is entitled to rescission of ETFA 3, return of US$6.25 million, and further relief to be determined. No-reliance clause bars non-fraudulent misrepresentation claims.
- Parties
- Claimant: Victor Pisante; Claimant: Swindon Holdings & Finance Limited; Claimant: BCA Shipping Investment Corporation; Claimant: Castor Navigation Limited; Defendant: George Logothetis; Defendant: Lomar Corporation Limited; Defendant: Lomar Shipmanagement Limited; Defendant: Libra Holdings Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 January 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Court Claim (deceit/fraudulent Misrepresentation) / Final Judgment After Full Trial
- Outcome
- Judgment for Swindon (claimant) against Libra and Mr Logothetis for deceit; rescission of ETFA 3; monetary relief granted; further relief to be determined; judgment for Swindon against Libra for €500,000 on Piraeus Bank claim; other claims dismissed or not pursued.
- Legal Topics
- Deceit, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Rescission, Damages, Joint Venture, Shipping Investments
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Victor Pisante
Claimant
Swindon Holdings & Finance Limited
Claimant
BCA Shipping Investment Corporation
Claimant
Castor Navigation Limited
Claimant
George Logothetis
Defendant
Lomar Corporation Limited
Defendant
Lomar Shipmanagement Limited
Defendant
Libra Holdings Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Claim (deceit/fraudulent Misrepresentation) / Final Judgment After Full Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Logothetis made fraudulent misrepresentations to induce Mr Pisante/Swindon to invest in the Lomar-KKR joint venture; Whether the representations were false and made with knowledge or recklessness as to their truth; Whether Swindon is entitled to rescission and/or damages for deceit; Whether any additional monetary relief is due for surrender of ETFA 2; Whether a no-reliance clause bars non-fraudulent misrepresentation claims.
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Logothetis, acting for Libra, made a false representation to Mr Pisante that Lomar would contribute US$40 million in 'cash and ships' as equity to the KKR joint venture, when in fact only ships were contributed and Lomar took cash out. This misrepresentation was made knowingly or recklessly, induced Swindon to roll over its ICBC cash and surrender ETFA 2 for a 30% derivative interest, and caused loss. Swindon is entitled to rescission of ETFA 3, return of US$6.25 million, and further relief to be determined. No-reliance clause bars non-fraudulent misrepresentation claims.
Court Disposition
Judgment for Swindon (claimant) against Libra and Mr Logothetis for deceit; rescission of ETFA 3; monetary relief granted; further relief to be determined; judgment for Swindon against Libra for €500,000 on Piraeus Bank claim; other claims dismissed or not pursued.
Orders
- Rescission of ETFA 3 between Swindon and Libra
- Libra to pay Swindon US$6.25 million plus interest (equitable discretion)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment