Cowan v Wakeling
Mr Cowan was not entitled to damages at law for breach of the partnership agreement; his remedy lay in an account after dissolution. The evidence did not support a higher award for lost rent or for the disposal of plant, and the judge's broad-brush approach was justified given the lack of evidence.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: George Nicholson Cowan; Respondent: Brian William Wakeling
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 February 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Assessment of Damages After Default Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Damages Assessment, Partnership Dissolution, Account of Profits, Breach of Partnership Agreement
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
George Nicholson Cowan
Appellant
Brian William Wakeling
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Assessment of Damages After Default Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the damages awarded to Mr Cowan for breach of partnership agreement were unjustifiably low
- 2 Whether Mr Cowan was entitled to damages at law or only to an account after dissolution of the partnership
- 3 Whether the evidence supported a higher award for lost rent and disposal of plant
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Cowan was not entitled to damages at law for breach of the partnership agreement; his remedy lay in an account after dissolution. The evidence did not support a higher award for lost rent or for the disposal of plant, and the judge's broad-brush approach was justified given the lack of evidence.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Partnership dissolved by consent
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment