Grimes, R. v [2006] EWCA Crim 1464 (16 May 2006)

Given the planning history and the applicant's repeated non-compliance, the sentence and costs were appropriate and the application for extension of time had no merit.

Citation: [2006] EWCA Crim 1464
Parties: Prosecution: Regina; Applicant: Gerald Grimes
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Judgment Date: 16 May 2006
Procedural Posture: Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome: applications refused
Legal Topics: Failure to Comply With Enforcement Notice, Planning (listed Buildings and Conservation Areas), Sentencing, Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal

Criminal Law Planning Law Failure to Comply With Enforcement Notice Planning (listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Sentencing Extension of Time Leave to Appeal

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2

Parties

Regina

Prosecution

Gerald Grimes

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

1 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive
2 Whether there was merit in granting an extension of time for leave to appeal against sentence

Ratio Decidendi

Given the planning history and the applicant's repeated non-compliance, the sentence and costs were appropriate and the application for extension of time had no merit.

Court Disposition

applications refused