Swinton Reds 20 Ltd v McCrory & Anor [2014] EWHC 2152 (Ch) (1 July 2014)
The SSA ceased to exist on 25th April 2013, but the parties entered into a new binding agreement on 1st May 2013 by exchange of emails, reviving the SSA with an extended period for satisfaction of conditions precedent. Swinton Reds is entitled to rectification and enforcement.
- Citation
- [2014] EWHC 2152 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Swinton Reds 20 Limited; Defendant: Gerard Martin McCrory; Defendant: Seebeck 87 Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 July 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Claim for Rectification of Register and Enforcement of Share Subscription Agreement / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claimant succeeds; relief granted.
- Legal Topics
- Share Subscription Agreement, Rectification of Register, Conditions Precedent, Estoppel by Convention
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Swinton Reds 20 Limited
Claimant
Gerard Martin McCrory
Defendant
Seebeck 87 Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Claim for Rectification of Register and Enforcement of Share Subscription Agreement / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the period for satisfaction of conditions precedent in the SSA was extended
- 2 Whether parties entered into a new agreement on 1st May 2013 with an extended period
- 3 Whether Swinton Reds is entitled to rectification and enforcement
Ratio Decidendi
The SSA ceased to exist on 25th April 2013, but the parties entered into a new binding agreement on 1st May 2013 by exchange of emails, reviving the SSA with an extended period for satisfaction of conditions precedent. Swinton Reds is entitled to rectification and enforcement.
Court Disposition
Claimant succeeds; relief granted.
Orders
- Rectification of Seebeck's register to reflect Swinton Reds' ownership
- Enforcement of the revived SSA
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment