Roberts & Anor v Gable & Ors
The defence of qualified privilege succeeds because the article was a disinterested report of ongoing allegations and counter-allegations within a political party, published in the public interest under the doctrine of reportage. The reporting did not adopt or endorse the allegations, and the public had a legitimate interest in being informed about disputes within a party presenting candidates for election.
- Parties
- Claimant: Christopher Roberts; Claimant: Barry Roberts; Defendant: Gerry Gable; Defendant: Steve Silver; Defendant: Searchlight Magazine Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 May 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Libel / Preliminary Issue on Qualified Privilege
- Outcome
- Defence of qualified privilege upheld
- Legal Topics
- Qualified Privilege, Reportage Doctrine, Freedom of Expression, Political Speech
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Christopher Roberts
Claimant
Barry Roberts
Claimant
Gerry Gable
Defendant
Steve Silver
Defendant
Searchlight Magazine Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Libel / Preliminary Issue on Qualified Privilege
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defence of qualified privilege applies to the publication of defamatory allegations in the context of political party disputes under the doctrine of reportage.
Ratio Decidendi
The defence of qualified privilege succeeds because the article was a disinterested report of ongoing allegations and counter-allegations within a political party, published in the public interest under the doctrine of reportage. The reporting did not adopt or endorse the allegations, and the public had a legitimate interest in being informed about disputes within a party presenting candidates for election.
Court Disposition
Defence of qualified privilege upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment